{"id":6736,"date":"2012-06-25T05:00:42","date_gmt":"2012-06-25T09:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/?p=6736"},"modified":"2012-06-25T10:12:02","modified_gmt":"2012-06-25T14:12:02","slug":"the-rationality-straw-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/6736","title":{"rendered":"The Rationality Straw Man (Updated)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week I <a title=\"When Female Genital Mutilation Ain't Enough\" href=\"http:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/2012\/06\/when-female-genital-mutilation-aint-enough\/\" target=\"_blank\">posted<\/a> about &#8220;breast ironing,&#8221; the practice by which young women&#8217;s developing breasts are &#8220;massaged, pounded, pressed, or patted with an object, usually heated in a wooden fire, to make them stop developing, grow more slowly or disappear completely&#8221; in Cameroon. See my original post on the topic for the logic behind the practice, which I do not care to validate further by discussing it again.<\/p>\n<p>In that post, I also discussed female genital mutilation (FGM), explaining how asking someone about their view of FGM was a litmus test of sorts for the limits of that person&#8217;s cultural relativism.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"@Carol_Gallo\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/Carol_gallo\" target=\"_blank\">Carol Gallo<\/a>\u00a0wrote an excellent <a title=\"When Female Genital Mutilation Ain't Enough--Comment\" href=\"http:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/2012\/06\/when-female-genital-mutilation-aint-enough\/#comment-13420\" target=\"_blank\">comment<\/a> on my post, in which she explained that it is difficult for well-meaning outsiders to understand cultural phenomena like FGM. I responded by explaining how, though I disagree with FGM, I see the practice as rational. After all, if the norm is to have one&#8217;s daughter FGMed, not following the norm might lead to a fate worse than following the norm.<\/p>\n<p>This is because of what we call a &#8220;multilateral punishment strategy&#8221; in economics &#8212; the phenomenon whereby norms are enforced by punishing those who do not follow norms, and by punishing would-be punishers whenever they fail to punish the transgressors. See <a title=\"Greif (AER, 1993)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/discover\/10.2307\/2117532\" target=\"_blank\">Greif&#8217;s (1993) classic article<\/a> on the Maghribi traders for a theoretical treatment, or read\u00a0Kaushik Basu&#8217;s <em><a title=\"Basu (2003)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Prelude-Political-Economy-Foundations-Economics\/dp\/0199261857\/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1340540644&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=prelude+political+economy\" target=\"_blank\">Prelude to Political Economy<\/a><\/em>\u00a0for a more intuitive discussion.<\/p>\n<p>Carol responded, further beginning as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Funnily enough, I only half-accept the idea of individual rationality because I see people do things that are terrible for them or make no sense all the time (&#8230;).<\/p>\n<p>This brings me to the topic of today&#8217;s post.<!--more--><\/p>\n<h3>The Rationality Straw Man<\/h3>\n<p>It is <em>de bon ton<\/em>\u00a0in the media and elsewhere to condemn economists for their belief in individual rationality. &#8220;Bah! Humbug!,&#8221; goes the critique, &#8220;we know people aren&#8217;t rational because they do dumb things, like, all the time&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But merely declaring that people aren&#8217;t rational does not make it so. In economics, individual rationality rests on two assumptions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><em>Completeness<\/em>: People can compare two alternatives\u00a0<em>x<\/em> and\u00a0<em>y<\/em>, and determine whether they prefer\u00a0<em>x<\/em> to\u00a0<em>y<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em> to\u00a0<em>x<\/em>, or whether they are indifferent between\u00a0<em>y<\/em> and\u00a0<em>x<\/em>, and<\/li>\n<li><em>Transitivity<\/em>: If someone prefers\u00a0<em>x<\/em> to\u00a0<em>y<\/em> and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> to\u00a0<em>z<\/em>, then that person prefers\u00a0<em>x<\/em> to\u00a0<em>z<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That&#8217;s it; that&#8217;s all. When an economist assumes individual rationality, all she is saying is that people&#8217;s preferences are complete and transitive. One can build a very rich theory of individual behavior on the basis of these two seemingly simple assumptions.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, there need not be an inconsistency between the assumption of individual rationality and doing dumb things. Car surfing is certainly among the dumbest things I can think of, but it&#8217;s not irrational &#8212; the teenager standing on the roof of his friend&#8217;s car might feel the need to prove something to himself or to his girlfriend, which outweighs the perceived risk of injury or death. The person who smokes two packs a day might strongly discount the future.<\/p>\n<p>In other words,\u00a0&#8220;We know people aren&#8217;t rational because they do dumb things&#8221; does not constitute a valid critique of individual rationality &#8212; it is more of a straw man than anything else. I would start <a title=\"Rabin (JEL, 1998)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/discover\/10.2307\/2564950\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> for a critique of individual rationality that has real traction.<\/p>\n<p>Update: <a title=\"@kelleher_\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/kelleher_\" target=\"_blank\">Paul Kelleher<\/a> notes in the comments that what I am talking about is not necessarily a straw man, and that perhaps the right concept to apply here is that of fallacy of equivocation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week I posted about &#8220;breast ironing,&#8221; the practice by which young women&#8217;s developing breasts are &#8220;massaged, pounded, pressed, or patted with an object, usually<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/6736\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Rationality Straw Man (Updated)<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-economics","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1gPg8-1KE","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6736"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6748,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6736\/revisions\/6748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcfbellemare.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}