That is the title of a new working paper I have with my Purdue University colleague Bernhard Dalheimer and my Master’s student Weston Loughmiller.
It is nice to be able to share this manuscript, which started with the observation that criticisms on efficiency grounds of policies like farm subsidies, while correct within the narrow framework of the textbook model, broadly tend to miss the mark because they miss an important externality, viz. that being able to protect its citizens from hunger in times of conflict is important for a state. That is, when economists tend to criticize such policies (and, more broadly, agricultural protection), they usually suffer from tunnel vision in that they tend to ignore what the textbook model assumes away, and end up worshipping the symbol (i.e., the model) for the thing symbolized (i.e., reality).