Skip to content

Category: Food

The Demand for Food of Poor Urban Households in Mexico

A cool new article in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy by Manuela Angelucci and Orazio Attanasio:

We use Oportunidades, a conditional cash transfer to women, to show that standard demand models do not represent the sample’s behavior: Oportunidades increases eligible households’ food budget shares, despite food being a necessity; demand for food and high-protein food changes over time only in treatment areas; the treatment effects on food and high-protein food consumption are larger than the prediction from the Engel curves at baseline; and the curves do not change in eligible households with high baseline bargaining power for the transfer recipient. Thus, handing transfers to women is a likely determinant of the observed nutritional changes.

Some of this might be a bit too technical for non-economists, so let’s take a closer look at their findings:

Hunger and Malnutrition: Data and Statistics

Last week, The Guardian‘s Poverty Matters blog had a great post linking to a number of hunger and malnutrition datasets.

There you can find a link that will allow you to download the entirety of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations’ food security indicators. Those are great data for anyone looking to write a term paper on food security, as the country-level annual data roughly span 1990 to 2012.

When I tweeted a link to the Guardian‘s post, Filip Spagnoli, a Brussels-based writer and philosopher, linked me to a post on his blog where he has a bunch of statistics on hunger.

Hunger

This week’s theme in my food policy seminar is hunger — hunger in the developing world, but also hunger historically in the US — which is a huge topic to cover in roughly 60 minutes of lecturing and 90 minutes of class discussion.

Fortuitously, the last week has been very fertile in terms of (discussions of) hunger online. A coalition of about 100 British charities has launched the If campaign, whose theme is “Enough Food for Everyone If” and is arranged around the four themes of foreign aid, corporate taxes, land grabs, and transparency.

A major point in favor of the If campaign is that it recognizes that the world produces enough food, but that not everyone has enough food because of distributional issues. In other words, the If campaign has taken Sen seriously by not suggesting that the world should produce more food as a solution to the hunger problem.