Skip to content

Category: Policy

Two Good Documentaries for Anyone Interested in Development

I spent the weekend before last bed-ridden because of migraines. When that happens, the only two things I can do while my migraines pass are listening to podcasts, reading on paper, or watching movies on my tablet computer.

As per my usual when I suffer from migraines, I did all those things, but I wanted to discuss two documentaries I watched that weekend. Both can be streamed from Netflix.

The first is The Pruitt-Igoe Myth, a documentary about the Pruitt-Igoe housing project in St. Louis. Here is the official trailer:

The fruit of high modernist urban planning aimed at eliminating the slums of St. Louis, Pruitt-Igoe opened its doors in 1954. Less than 20 years later, the various levels of government involved agreed to demolish all 33 of the 11-story apartment buildings that formed Pruitt-Igoe because of the poverty, crime, and segregation found therein. Here is a critical review in City Journal.

Question 1 from My Development Midterm

Refer to the figure above, and consider the unitary agricultural model and the case where the Separation Property (Singh et al., 1986) holds, which we discussed in lecture.

The household produces a quantity [math]q=F(L,E^A)[/math] of a staple crop, where [math]L[/math] denotes a household’s labor allocation and [math]E^A[/math] denotes its endowment of land, which we assume fixed in this case. The household consumes a quantity [math]c[/math] of the staple crop. The household also has an endowment of labor time [math]E^L[/math], which it allocates among on-farm labor [math]L[/math], leisure [math]\ell[/math], and market labor [math]L^m[/math], though do note that the household can also hire in labor if it needs to, and that hired labor is denoted [math]L^h[/math]. The household faces wage [math]w[/math] and staple price [math]p[/math].

Pick one of the following three changes in the household’s economic circumstances:

  1. An increase in the household’s labor endowment, possibly as a result of one of the household’s children attaining adulthood. In other words, the household’s preference structure for consumption and labor remains the same, but the household simply has more labor time,
  2. An increase in the price of the staple paired with a decrease in the prevailing wage, or
  3. The adoption of better soil fertility management practices.

Illustrate the change you choose in a graph, and discuss its consequences for the household. Make sure your answer completely describes what happens to the economic circumstances of the household and provides some intuition (or brief explanations) as to why variables change the way they do as a consequence of the change you pick.

In Montreal this Week for the Global Food Security Conference

I am spending the week in Montreal for the Global Food Security Conference at McGill University.

I will be speaking at a session titled “Can High Food Prices and Volatility Be Managed?,” along with Evan Fraser, who co-wrote Empires of Food, one of my favorite books on food policy.

If you will be attending the conference, come by and say hi. If you are in Montreal and would like to go out for drinks, get in touch.