I spent Monday of last week in Rome to talk about food waste with policy makers and a handful of other researchers who have worked on the topic. As I sat there, one thing occurred to me about the work I have done on the topic with my Minnesota colleagues which in retrospect, I really wish we had had the presence of mind to include in the paper.
When it comes to food waste, the world is split into two categories: 1. Those who think food waste is a huge problem which policy makers have to tackle, and 2. Those who think food waste is likely a problem, but one that is nowhere near as important as those in category 1 would have you believe.
Given the work I have done on the topic, I fall squarely in category 2. Recall that my work on the topic (link opens a .pdf) says that the quantity of food waste is vastly overstated because of the definitions used. Worse, my work says that the value of food waste is even more overstated because it multiplies the aforementioned overstated quantity by retail prices when, in fact, food items are often wasted well before the retail stage.